Government
Public trust through accuracy
Try Live DemoAI evaluation for government
Federal, state, and local agencies are adopting AI to draft policy briefs, generate public communications, produce regulatory documents, and summarize program data. But large language models fabricate statistics and regulatory references with the same confidence they use for verified data. In a sector where public trust, FOIA obligations, and information quality standards demand absolute accuracy, unchecked AI output is an institutional risk.
Frisby AI Operations provides forensic accuracy verification calibrated for government — catching fabricated statistics, wrong CFR citations, non-compliant public communications, and biased AI outputs before they enter the public record.
AI evaluation challenges
unique to government
Government AI outputs carry public trust consequences. A fabricated statistic in a policy brief, wrong regulation citation, or hallucinated data in a public report can erode citizen confidence, trigger FOIA liability, and violate federal transparency mandates.
⚠ Fabricated Statistics & Data
AI models generate plausible but invented statistics, fabricate census data, and produce hallucinated economic indicators. Government reports containing false data undermine evidence-based policymaking and expose agencies to public scrutiny and congressional oversight.
⚠ Wrong Regulatory Citations
LLMs confidently cite repealed executive orders, produce incorrect CFR references, and fabricate agency guidance documents. AI-generated regulatory documents with phantom citations create compliance gaps and undermine administrative authority.
⚠ Non-Compliant Public Communications
AI-drafted public notices, press releases, and constituent communications may violate Plain Language Act requirements, Section 508 accessibility standards, or OMB information quality guidelines. Non-compliant communications erode public trust and trigger Information Quality Act challenges.
⚠ Bias in AI-Assisted Decisions
AI outputs used in benefits determinations, grant scoring, and enforcement decisions may reflect training data biases. Biased AI-assisted government decisions violate equal protection principles, Title VI requirements, and the Biden-Harris Executive Order on AI safety.
⚠ FOIA & Records Management Risk
AI-generated documents become federal records subject to FOIA requests, Federal Records Act obligations, and litigation holds. Inaccurate AI content in government records creates discoverable evidence of negligence and complicates records management compliance.
⚠ Grant & Procurement Document Errors
AI-drafted grant solicitations, RFPs, and procurement evaluations may contain fabricated evaluation criteria, wrong FAR references, and hallucinated funding amounts. These errors can trigger bid protests, GAO review, and acquisition regulation violations.
How Frisby tools address
each government challenge
Government Document Auditing
Decompose every AI-generated government document into auditable claims — statistics, regulatory citations, policy references, budget figures, and factual assertions. Each claim is cross-referenced against source data, CFR provisions, and agency records. Verdicts classify each data point as Verified, Discrepancy, Hallucination, or Unverified.
Federal Compliance Validation
Automatically screen AI-generated documents for compliance with OMB information quality guidelines, Plain Language Act requirements, Section 508 accessibility standards, and FISMA documentation requirements. The Validator flags non-compliant content and identifies missing required elements.
Public Trust Risk Scoring
Score every AI output for accuracy risk, compliance exposure, and public trust impact. The Evaluator provides a 1–10 accuracy grade, flags high-severity errors that could trigger congressional oversight or public backlash, and generates risk dashboards for agency leadership.
Try it now
Paste any AI-generated text and run a four-dimensional audit.
Results that matter
accuracy in public documents
compliance assurance
faster report generation
Built for the documents
your agency produces every day
Policy Briefs & Regulatory Documents
Audit AI-drafted policy briefs, regulatory impact analyses, and rulemaking documents for fabricated statistics, wrong CFR citations, and hallucinated economic projections. Ensure every data point and regulatory reference is verified before publication or submission to the Federal Register.
Risk: Fabricated data → flawed policy & congressional oversight
Public Notices & Constituent Communications
Verify AI-generated press releases, public notices, and constituent correspondence for factual accuracy, Plain Language Act compliance, and information quality standards. Catch wrong dates, fabricated program details, and misleading statistics before public release.
Risk: Wrong public data → trust erosion & IQA challenges
RFPs, Grants & Acquisition Documents
Audit AI-generated solicitations, grant announcements, and procurement evaluation documents for wrong FAR references, fabricated evaluation criteria, and hallucinated funding amounts. Protect against bid protests and GAO review findings.
Risk: Wrong procurement docs → bid protests & GAO findings
Agency Reports & Performance Data
Validate AI-drafted annual reports, GPRA performance summaries, and IG audit responses for fabricated metrics, wrong program data, and hallucinated performance outcomes. Ensure every reported figure is traceable to source data systems.
Risk: Fabricated metrics → IG findings & appropriations risk
Phased adoption roadmap
for government agencies
Assessment
Map current AI usage across the agency. Identify highest-risk document types and compliance obligations under OMB M-24-10 and EO 14110.
Week 1–2
Pilot
Deploy the AI Content Auditor on a single high-risk document type — policy briefs or public communications. Measure baseline accuracy and compliance rates.
Week 3–6
Expansion
Extend auditing to procurement documents, regulatory filings, and performance reports. Integrate with agency document management systems.
Week 7–12
Agency-Wide
Full agency deployment with FedRAMP-aligned infrastructure, batch processing, API integration, and automated reporting for AI governance officers and CIOs.
Month 4+
“We piloted Frisby on AI-drafted policy briefs and immediately discovered fabricated Bureau of Labor Statistics figures and hallucinated CFR references that had passed through two rounds of human review. The tool is now part of our standard publication workflow.”
— Chief Data Officer, Federal Cabinet Agency
Frequently asked questions
Ready to bring AI evaluation
to your agency?
Forensic, evidence-based AI content verification built for government. Catch hallucinations before they enter public records, policy documents, or constituent communications.
Government and public sector pricing available. Contact our team for GSA Schedule and direct procurement options.